Section1: Preface and Tips. doc.R0
- There are governments ruling over every country. These are different in nature, philosophy, application. These governments are embodied into ‘Government people’ (those who are in the government) and they ‘finish up’ concluding and deciding ‘what Government people do’ is what ‘government should do’. And this is wrong.
- There are ‘Government working over the globe for centuries and in the same country, different government’s work differently exhibiting differences in their ‘governance philosophies’ and ‘perceptions of governance’. One may be ‘superior’, other may be ‘inferior’. Government people ‘come and go’ but ‘citizen remains and loses’.
- The ‘government people’ in normal course shall not define their ‘responsibilities and accountability’ as it would ‘hamper’ their actions and intentions especially the actions normally ‘justified’ under the cover of ‘politics’.
- The citizen are not directly associated in the ‘decisions’ and ‘actions’ of the government (or government people) and government people almost decide ‘independently’. So the suitability of decision remains ‘uncertain’ almost always.
- This document ‘comprehensively’ state the ‘responsibility and accountability’ aspects of a government, as this only ‘brings them up’ for ‘public service’.
- This compilation has many chapters prepared over a period of years. The title of the chapter has been kept close to the ‘contents within’. The chapters pertains to ‘many different aspects of governance and elements, actors, players of governance’ thus not lined up in any particular manner. Though each chapter pertains to independent ‘activity and topic’ but happens to be ‘orbiting’ the subject of ‘government’s governance’
- It is evident that the decisions of the government (or government people) yields direct impact on the citizen/people of the nation. Every decision thus affects their lives, attitude and behaviour. Though it is not possible to ‘measure’ the performance of a government, as no parameters, measurement techniques and standards available, the facts which are visible in the form of ‘government services’ and ‘citizen amenities and citizen behaviour’ can be directly used to signify the ‘success or failure’ of a government. This methodology has been adopted to present and signify the performance of governments.
- There are two type of documents. ‘doc’ and ‘excel’. The ‘doc’ documents contains the ‘explanations, reasoning, arguments’ for ‘structuring the documents’ in that fashion and the ‘explanation’ about the contents contained in it. These are ‘narrative’ and ‘academic’.
- The other document ‘excel’ contains the ‘facts, realities, happenings’ which are physically ‘visible’ or ‘missing’ and a (+) and (-) score is assigned to each fact/happening. For that particular ‘head’ there may be a number of facts/happening with score assigned. The real life is to be examined regarding the position about each fact/happening and marks to be allotted as noted therein. The ‘allotted marks’ of items (facts/happenings), total shall represent the ‘score obtained’.
- The total (+) scores of individual items are added and say comes to ‘Sp’. The total (-) scores of individual items are added and say comes to ‘Sm’. The rating of the ‘head’ representing ‘system, fact, happening…’ shall be as below:
Basic principles:
- Some basic derivations are as below:
- Every ‘bad’ occurrence is the result of ‘Murkhta (Stupidity) and /or ‘beimani (corruption) and/or Impotence (incapability), may be one at a time or together. Thus for every ‘bad’ happening ‘MUBI’ assessment must be done.
- There are two faces of everything, every decision, every happening, ‘Good and bad’. Therefore every aspect need to be analysed to understand both faces
- Every ‘good’ thing loses its worth after a limit and if continues further, it turns into ‘bad’
- There are two reasons for a ‘political leader’ to climb up to the ‘government level’, first is the urge of ‘social service’ and if not, then it is ‘selfish interest of self-gains’.
- The Newton’s third law represents that anything continues in the same state unless an external force is applied to change the course. Thus the ‘MUBI governance system’ would continue in the same state unless external force is applied, and this external force would be ‘intelligence’.
- Emotions and logic/rational are contradictory. There are no ‘real emotions’ in this world except ‘compassion’. All other ‘emotions’ love, anger, hatred etc are associated with ‘selfishness’ and ‘do not qualify’ for a standalone ‘honest and sincere expression’ of encompassed welfare.
- Thus the governance ‘must be’ based upon ‘rational and intelligence’ and not on ‘emotions’.
Methodology:
The methodology adopted is first to explain and describe the ‘subject matter’ and the ‘logic, reasoning’ for its ‘existence’ are appended. The ‘appropriate form’ is conceived serving its ‘existence’ and presented. These are .doc files.
However, the most important ‘constituent is the ‘application’ which normally is ‘missing’ almost always, intentionally or unintentionally because of ‘Mubidity’, which creates most significant ‘handicap’ to ‘verify and measure’ the failures and/or accomplishments. So everything becomes ‘absurd’.
‘Application’ of the ‘reasoning’ are contained in the ‘associated’ ‘excel’ document in which number of items associated with ‘application’ appear, containing the score/marks against each. If an item occurs supporting the ‘cause of existence’ and ‘good reasoning’, it is assigned (+) marks and if it is opposite, it is assigned (-) minus marks.
The ‘quantum/size of marks’ earmarked against an item may vary slightly ‘subject to’ the considerations given by an individual ‘governance system’, however, the nature (+) or (-) would not vary normally.
This procedure has been elaborated in the para 8, 9, 10 above to find the overall topic score of a particular head/main topic which is summed in para 10. This is ‘MUBI’ score of that topic/happening. The more (-) minus score represents high ‘mubidity’ and thus higher ‘inappropriateness/unsuitability’. Minus(-)100 shall be more minus than (-)50, thus (-)100 shall be more ‘undesirable’.
In case of positive (+) topic score this is reversed, and 100 (+100) shall be more desirable than 50(+50).
Thus the ‘Governance suitability score (Index) of any government can be assessed by any person/citizen and can be assessed by the ‘governments’ to verify the ‘purposefulness and suitability’ of their existence.
So, with this document any common person can evaluate the ‘worthiness and suitability’ of a country’s ‘governance system’, therefore, it is named as ‘Basic People’s Verification code of Governance’.
Section 2: Chapters
The Basic People’s verification Code of Governance BPVCOG has the following chapters:
- Chapter1: Government’s structure and behaviour model
- Chapter2: Why a Government: Government foremost responsibilities
- Chapter3: Government’s sincerity:
- Chapter4: Government’s responsibilities
- Chapter5: Government behaviour good vs bad-Masterism vs Service provider
- Chapter 6: Governance Amiss routes:
- Chapter7: Corruption-Governance Amiss routes
- Chapter 8: Government people’s (GPP) behaviour
- Chapter9 :Governance foundations
- Chapter 10: Government people eligibility
- Chapter11: Government business entity
- Chapter12: Justice system
- Chapter13: Laws and Rules
- Chapter14: Democracy validation
- Chapter15: Independence
- Chapter 16: Political Party
- Chapter 17: Political leader sincerity
- Chapter18: Citizen delight vs miseries
- Chapter19: Madiak/Media- Selfish vs accountable
- Chapter 20: Citizen behaviour
- Chapter21: Business domain: selfish vs accountable
- Chapter22: Government units, entity, department behaviour
- Chapter23: Good governance: New prerequisites
- Chapter 24: Why ‘WRONG’ would occur
- Chapter25: Quality model
- Chapter26: Organization rightness
- Chapter27: Government citizen interface
- Chapter28: Road model- Social and economic; Portrayal of the region
Contents in Chapters:
Abbreviations.doc.R0
Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you penning this post plus the rest of the site is really good. Gianina Ryan Hurlee
Regarding- your comments on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decision’s worth, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility-accountability, Elections, Selections etc
You made some good points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most persons will consent with your website. Vivyan Murdoch Lovel
Regarding- your comments on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decision’s worth, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility-accountability, Elections, Selections etc
You are an amazing writer! I just bookmarked your site. Cecilla Jayson Hertberg
Regarding- your comments on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decision’s worth, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility-accountability, Elections, Selections etc
Appreciating the persistence you put into your site and detailed information you provide. Joana Nester Indihar
Regarding- your comments on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decision’s worth, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility-accountability, Elections, Selections etc
I cannot thank you enough for the article. Much thanks again. Want more. Elora Erhart Romaine
Regarding: My web site http//:bpverma.com/
My Dear friend,
Thanks for your ‘good words’ to support my derivations and analogy presented on web-site. If you happen to know one, may please recommend to the experts/scholars associated in research works and/or in ‘Universities’ studying/working/researching in the fields of ‘Governance system, Government people, Justice system, Media/Madiak, Political systems, Behaviour of political people, Behaviour of Government people’ etc. to visit my web site and promote. Thanks once again.
BP Verma
I want to to thank you for this very good read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you book marked to check out new things you post? Sarette Giffard Scales
Regarding: My web site http//:bpverma.com/
My Dear friend,
Thanks for your ‘good words’ to support my derivations and analogy presented on web-site. If you happen to know one, may please recommend to the experts/scholars associated in research works and/or in ‘Universities’ studying/working/researching in the fields of ‘Governance system, Government people, Justice system, Media/Madiak, Political systems, Behaviour of political people, Behaviour of Government people’ etc. to visit my web site and promote. Thanks once again.
BP Verma
Wow, this piece of writing is nice, my sister is analyzing these kinds
of things, thus I am going to inform her.
Also visit my web blog weed gummies (https://www.peninsuladailynews.com/)
Regarding: Your comments on my web site http//:bpverma.com/
My Dear friend,
Thanks for your ‘good words’ to support my derivations and analogy presented on web-site. If you happen to know one, may please recommend to the experts/scholars associated in research works and/or in ‘Universities’ studying/working/researching in the fields of ‘Governance system, Government people, Justice system, Media/Madiak, Political systems, Behaviour of political people, Behaviour of Government people’ etc. to visit my web site and promote. Thanks once again.
BP Verma
Ahaa, its nice conversation concerning this
article at this place at this web site, I have read all that, so now me also commenting here.
Regarding: Your comments on my web site http//:bpverma.com/
My Dear friend,
Thanks for your ‘good words’ to support my derivations and analogy presented on web-site. If you happen to know one, may please recommend to the experts/scholars associated in research works and/or in ‘Universities’ studying/working/researching in the fields of ‘Governance system, Government people, Justice system, Media/Madiak, Political systems, Behaviour of political people, Behaviour of Government people’ etc. to visit my web site and promote.
Also I am an engineer and not an expert on ‘governance’ and ‘social/political science’. But I critically observe/examine the happenings of real life and derive the link and chain to co-relate and model these to establish the performance of ‘Government people’ which is ‘totally missing’ over the globe.
Thanks once again.
BP Verma
I am truly thankful to the owner of this web site who has shared this fantastic piece of writing at at this place.
Regarding- your comments on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decision’s worth, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility-accountability, Elections, Selections etc
Thanks for all your efforts that you have put in this.
Regarding: Your remarks on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. My modelling and analogy is just ‘analysis of real happenings’ to ‘bring out the reasons behind’. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decisions, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility, Government accountability, Elections etc
I read this post your post so nice and very informative post thanks for sharing this post
Regarding: Your remarks on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. My modelling and analogy is just ‘analysis of real happenings’ to ‘bring out the reasons behind’. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decisions, Government People behavior, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility, Government accountability, Elections etc
Regarding: Your remarks on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. My modelling and analogy is just ‘analysis of real happenings’ to ‘bring out the reasons behind’. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decisions, Government People behaviour, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility, Government accountability, Elections etc
Wow, that’s what I was looking for, what a information! present here at this
blog, thanks admin of this site.
Regarding: Your remarks on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. My modelling and analogy is just ‘analysis of real happenings’ to ‘bring out the reasons behind’. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decisions, Government People behaviour, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility, Government accountability, Elections etc
wonderful post, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t realize this.
You should continue your writing. I am confident, you’ve a great readers’ base
already!
Regarding: Your remarks on my web site http://bpverma.com/
Thanks for your good words. My modelling and analogy is just ‘analysis of real happenings’ to ‘bring out the reasons behind’. May please recommend to Scholars, Experts, Professors, Universities, Research organizations in the field of Governance, Public policy, Justice system, Laws and Rules, Political party system, Government Decisions, Government People behaviour, Citizen empowerment, Public Media, Governance eligibility, Government accountability, Elections etc